The problem with “conspiracy theory” is that it tends to stay in the realm of pure “theory”, if you can even call most of it that. That’s why I say “don’t listen to conspiracy theorists! Listen to conspiracy empiricists.” There’s far too much junk theory to bother with discussions without quickly drilling down to the hard facts. This discussion also seems to be staying in the realm of theory. But I’d like to see someone in the integral world tackle the actual data, the hard stuff such as the writings of the globalist NGOs themselves who make up the “New World Order”. [[And not the conspiracy theory New World Order, but that organization or network who routinely calls itself by that name, such as at G8 summit meetings etc.]]

I like your defusing of conspiracy theory angst. Somewhat along the lines of ‘Hanlon’s Razor’ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon's_razor)

“Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.”