Synchronicity: A Post-Metaphysical Interpretation
Posted by Corey W. deVosJul 21
A year or two ago i recorded this piece with Ken Wilber during one of the live conference calls at Integral Spiritual Center, and i found the discussion to be absolutely fascinating. Synchronicity has long been a defining texture in my own spiritual path, and was a topic which, until this call, i had never heard Ken speak or write about. Although i can certainly understand his silence around the subject, still i believe that the Integral vision can give us a much more lucid understanding of how synchronicity actually works, beyond the deeply confused interpretations offered by New Agers, Quantum Meta-Physicians, and peddlers of various consciousness-scams such as The Secret.
Do you think the Integral map can help us to better understand the energetic mechanics of synchronicity? Is such an inquiry even useful for integral practicioners? Let me know your throughts!
Synchronicity: A Post-Metaphysical InterpretationAudio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
My question to Ken:
“Synchronicity has long been an intrinsic part of my own spiritual path, something i have come to regard as a sort of “experiential faith”, and i have long desired to find a place for it within the integral model. For me, synchronicity feels almost like a collapse of the four quadrants of my holon into a singular experience of tetra-emergence, in which my UL intention, my UR actions, my LR circumstances, and my LL sense of meaning and context all fall into perfect symmetry with each other. In these moments, there is a sensation that the totality of my subject suddenly becomes object in my awareness, a sort of bird’s-eye-view of self–and perhaps more profoundly, there is usually a sense of presence of and sometimes even subtle interaction with an intelligence that is undeniably greater than my own.
In the twenty tenets, there is a wonderful description of the relationship that exists between junior and senior holons, namely that the lower determines the possibilities of the higher, the higher determines the probabilities of the lower–so that of all the things that could possibly happen, certain things become more likely to happen. Could this have something to do with synchronistic experiences? Would this explain why there have been so many different names for this synchronicity throughout history: magenta fate, red destiny, amber miracles and grace, orange luck and coincidence, green “interconnectivity of the web-of-life”…. And if there is indeed a higher holon determining the probability fields of my human experience, what/where/who is that higher holon?”
Some interpretations of Synchronicity, according to altitude:
- Magenta: fate, omens
- Red: destiny, the “law of attraction” (e.g. The Secret, a red wolf in green clothing)
- Amber: miracles, divine providence, grace, karma
- Orange: luck, chance, coincidence, “statistical anomalies”
- Green: web-of-life interconnectivity, Celestince Prophecy type Synchronicity, Hippie Karma
- 2nd Tier: symmetrical collapse of intention (UL), behavior (UR), meaning (LL), and circumstance (LR)
5 comments
Comment by Linda Hollier on July 22, 2009 at 12:16 am
At the following link is a personal anecdote to invite discussion and encourage further sharing on this topic:
http://integrallife.com/member/linda-hollier/blog/dalai-lama-and-synchronicity
Thanks for introducing this topic, Corey. Giving such an experience a post-metaphysical interpretation added to its value for me.
Comment by Todd Mertz on July 22, 2009 at 1:00 am
Do you find that interpreting or conceptualizing synchronicity collapses along with the collapse or confluence of intention, behavior, meaning and circumstance that you mention? How does the meaning collapse, would you say? Does meaning still matter? What is your intention in posting this? Is this a question of widening the circle? collaboration? looking for synchronicity?
Is there simply the option of an experiential or intentional attentional shift from gross interpretations (at high or low levels) or behavior to more of a straightforward, momentary, subtle acceptance and affirmation (“next structure attempting to be born” out/in to infinity-nonduality)?
I’ve also had what I’d consider a non-drug-induced spontaneous satori (I’ll go with James Austin’s ZEN AND THE BRAIN description as closest for me), and it has changed things:) I’ve tended to disregard synchronicity due to oversimplified interpretation, but I’m curious about what you might have to say. (Has this just become a hermeneutic trap?) I’ve recently been asking myself how something like Wilber’s philosophy, biofeedback, and intentional practice technologies change the path or influence the likelihood and texture of “accidents”. It seems to me that this all involves an intentional, informed-by-good-theory, shift from purposeful or disciplined drive to less effortful intention through clarity to grace. Seems impossible to describe it without doing/being it. Like we’re talking about what sort of yellow SDi inputs to validate as one’s contributions to higher-than-yellow group potentials. In one, sense the answer, then, is YES-YOU! or YES-ME! or YES-US! (-with-no-Other).
Is this predominantly a question of how momentariness or pinpoint awareness (singlemindedness or the emptiness characteristic) interacts with other time experiences? At 43 minutes into your conversation, Wilber mentions similar potentialities being simultaneously evoked. Are you checking for similar potentialities? communion? Are you basically asking (like 46 minutes in) whether folks believe/feel Eros actually exists? “You can’t explain emergence”, but we can choose some extent of our input. That extent and input come down to intentional attentional abilities and unique history/potential. Better attentional abilities allow for greater agency or design.
Comment by John Wagnon on July 22, 2009 at 2:08 pm
I tend to be skeptical of morphogenetic fields – they don’t seem falsifiable to me. I have certainly had the experience of synchronicity. It is present at least in the 1p and probably the 2p as well. Is it present in the 3p? So far it doesn’t seem accessible by 3p methods (which is why orange science calls it luck and coincidence). Perhaps it is something that can only be falsified or validated by methods from 4p perspectives or higher. Given that we have only barely begun developing injunctions for the 4p then it is possible that future injunctions will validate synchronicity as an all quadrant phenomenon – just as it is possible that future injunctions will validate all kinds of things. For right now, though, it seems to me to be limited to the left quadrants and so is more a phenomenon of perception than anything.
Imho.
Pingback by Help me help you help me. « CoreyWdeVos.com on July 22, 2009 at 11:33 pm
[...] (Coincidently, his name was also Corey. That kind of stuff freaks me out sometimes, as you can read about here. Another weird coincidence: he and me are also the same person, and i was talking to myself at [...]
Comment by Katherine Konner on July 23, 2009 at 12:02 pm
I’m using the seeker route having amassed personal experience, no books, and the above audio stream. Was considering the ‘feeling’ and sensing of a ‘presence’ while awareness of synchronicity occurring and the idea of all quadrants simultaneously aligning and collapsing, dropping the body/mind into the next structure of consciousness, enabling the higher self, that which is trying to emerge, to make a grounded, landing of place within the space of the self.
The dropping into your body can be correlated to the creation of a boundary. The boundary as emergence, establishes and enables the sense of self experience, aka, being present such that it feels like a presence (go forth/go to self). The boundary is the container that holds the experience. Enabling awareness as consciousness to collect, to remember, to keep in place. The boundary holds the presence of self.
Also, synchronicity might not just be the joy of everything falling in a good way, when everything seems great! That’s how it is mostly spoken about. The other day I had a synchronistic occurrence which led to an understanding. Nothing kept happening that I had tried to plan and put in place. So reality precipitated, rained on my expectations, and manifested clarity, direction. Similar domain. And suddenly, the same dropping into feeling, sense of presence, knowing.
Plus, now I get to write about it. Right here. Right now. Right on COREYWDEVOS.com. I hear a yippee over here….